IMM 30th ANNIVERSARY
CELEBRATION
Chicago Mercantile Exchange
Chicago, Illinois
May 14, 2002
Videotaped Congratulatory Message
by Milton Friedman in Honor of the
30th Anniversary Celebration of the IMM
It is a great pleasure to be with you today to celebrate the 30th
anniversary of the establishment of the International Money Market.
This morning's Wall Street Journal carries quotations
for 48 financial contracts. Contracts in currencies, contracts in interest rates,
contracts in indexes. Each for a number of different dates, and that doesn't even count
futures options. These contracts are traded on futures exchanges around the world, and
they constitute a major undertaking in the worldwide capital markets. They enable
investors and traders to hedge and trade risk in a way that enables them to pursue their
objectives. They have contributed to the remarkable growth in world trade over the past 30
years.
It's hard to recall today what the situation was like in 1971
when financial futures contracts were merely a gleam in the eye of Leo Melamed, the
remarkable man who was then Chairman of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange.
Futures markets are indeed very old, dating back many centuries,
but they were traditionally markets in commodities, there were no markets in financial
items. The business of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange was typical. It was butter and
eggs, potatoes and onions, pork bellies and cattle. Banks and other large financial
institutions might offer future cover to their customers, but none of them would offer the
public at large such facilities -- as I found out when I tried to short the British pound
at one point, and no bank in Chicago would take my order. It was that episode as reported
in the Wall Street Journal that led Leo Melamed to telephone me one day in 1971,
asking for me to provide counsel and advice on a crazy idea he had of establishing a
market in financial futures. At the time, such a market would have been impossible because
at the time, the Bretton Woods agreement was in existence, and currencies, foreign
currencies, were traded at pegged exchange rates. Exchange rates were changed sometimes by
large amounts, but only by long intervals. There was none of that day-to-day price
movement and fluctuation which is the very lifeblood of futures market, which is necessary
in order to have a volume of trading that will enable hedgers to hedge, speculators to
speculate. However, Leo could see, as I did, that the Bretton Woods system was not long
for this world, that it was running into increasing difficulty and that it was likely to
be succeeded by a very different system, a system of floating exchange rates. He called on
me for advice because he knew of my interest and activity in that area, and he wanted to
get assurance from me that floating exchange rates were coming, and that they would
provide the kind of continuous price movement that was necessary for a market.
In view of that vision, Leo and his colleagues developed the
International Money Market. They developed the idea of a market in which the items traded
would be futures in currencies, and their timing was perfect. The Bretton Woods system
came to an end on August 15th 1971, when President Nixon closed the gold window
as part of the broad program of price and wage control.
The International Money Market started on May 16th. It
started with trading in seven currencies. Its reception by the financial market was
anything but enthusiastic -- this was a crazy idea by those people out in Chicago. On the
day the IMM opened for business, one New York bank foreign exchange dealer was quoted in
the Wall Street Journal as saying, and I quote, "I am amazed that a bunch of
crapshooters in pork bellies had the temerity to think that they can beat some of the
world's most sophisticated traders at their own game." The bunch of crapshooters went
from one success to another, first trading in currencies, then introducing contracts in
interest rates and stock prices and so on, until you have the variety that you have today.
In 1981, they introduced cash settlement instead of physical
completion, and that made it possible to establish the Eurodollar market, today the
largest of the items traded. Today, financial futures account for 98 percent of the
contracts traded at the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, and the Chicago Mercantile Exchange
is by far the largest financial (futures) market in the United States.
That's not a bad story for a bunch of crapshooters. My heartiest
congratulations to them on their 30th anniversary -- and in particular, to the
Chief Crapshooter of them all, Leo Melamed.
Thank you.
Remarks by Leo Melamed
at the CME Celebration of the
30th Anniversary of the IMM
Milton Friedman is correct in pointing out that it
is impossible today for anyone to fully visualize the time in 1971 when the idea for
futures in financial instruments was born.
Indeed, how can weliving in the globalized world of present
day:
where Dick Tracy technology is not the figment of Chester
Gould's imagination but every teenager's reality,
where every nuance of market information is transmitted to
every corner of the world at cyberspace speed,
when dramatic market values transformations result at the
sound-bite utterance of a government official,
where contract settlement occurs not in physical delivery but
in cash,
where financial futures contracts are traded on every
continent, from Argentina to Australia, from Italy to India, from Taiwan to Turkey,
when 98% of CME transaction volume is financial,
when last year's Eurodollar futures volume alone, not counting
options, recorded 184 million contracts,
when last year's CME's total notional value was 293.9 trillion
dollars.
How can we picture what it was like 30 years ago to propose
currency futures at a time:
when board markers used chalk to record bids and offers,
when technology consisted of a ticker-tape flowing into a
wastebasket,
when business was so leisurely that you could smoke in the
pits,
when our market's entire connection to finance was in grains,
hogs, cattle, pork bellies, eggs, butter, poultry, potatoes and lumber,
where total CME annual volume was a touch over 3 million
contracts.
To illustrate the psychology of those days, I have often used
Bruce Johnson's tale, of when he invited some of his Iowa relatives to visit the floor
after the IMM was launched. They told him they came to see the pit where Swiss hot dogs
were traded. It took him a moment or two to realize they were thinking of the Swiss Franc
contract.
Indeed, how can anyone today imagine futures markets without an
interest-rate component, without currency contracts, without equity indices. Not only are
our markets of today but a distant cousin of the markets of three decades ago, with but a
faint resemblance to what they were, they are today an indispensable component of the
global financial fabric.
In May of 1986, fourteen years after its inception, Nobel
Laureate of Economics, Merton H. Miller, bestowed upon the IMM a supreme and unparalleled
honor -- he nominated financial futures as "the most significant financial innovation
of the last twenty years."1
Alan Greenspan's current congratulatory message makes a similar
assessment when he states "Indeed, the transformation of the financial system has
been so profound and the benefits so great, that it seems questionable whether even those
that launched the IMM could have full appreciated what they were setting in motion."2
Of course we didn't. But we knew it was revolutionary and big. In
the 1972 IMM Annual message to the members I dared say:
The opening of the International Monetary Market on May 16, 1972
was as revolutionary a step as the establishment of the first organized commodity exchange
when that event occurred...
...we believe the IMM is larger in scope than currency futures
alone, and accordingly we hope to bring to our threshold many other contracts and
commodities that relate directly to monetary matters and that would complement the
economics of money futures.
And we were fearless:
We were a bunch of guys who were hungry.
We were traders to whom it did not matter-
whether it was eggs or gold, bellies or
the British pound, turkeys or T-bills.
We were babes in the woods, innocents,
in a world we did not understand,
too dumb to be scared.
We were audacious, brazen, raucous pioneers-
too unworldly to know we could not win.
That the odds against us were too high;
That the banks would never trust us;
That the government would never let us;
That Chicago was the wrong place.
And we were lucky.
I dare say, if ever one needed proof that "Necessity is the
mother of invention," one need only review the economic disorders leading to and
following the creation of our new exchange.
What followed was an era of financial turmoil rarely equaled in
modern history; turmoil that tested the very foundations of western society: the U.S.
dollar plunged precipitously; U.S. unemployment reached in excess of 10%; oil prices
skyrocketed to $39 a barrel; the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell to 570; gold reached
$800 an ounce; U.S. inflation climbed to an unprecedented peacetime rate of 20%; interest
rates went even higher.
Still, I doubt I could ever have had the courage to proceed with
this revolutionary concept without its embrace by Milton Friedman.
The man who last week, at the White House celebration in honor of
his 90th birthday, was honored by the President as the man who changed the
world by devoting his life to promoting the invisible hand of economics while denouncing
the invisible foot of government. The man who Mr. Greenspan called the greatest economist
of the 20th Century. The man who for me, thirty years ago as well as today,
embodied an economic Supreme Being. His endorsement of the idea was all the validation I
needed.
Wrote Professor Friedman in the position paper commissioned by
the CME in the fall of 1971:
Changes in the international financial structure will create a
great expansion in the demand for foreign cover. It is highly desirable that this demand
be met by as broad, as deep, as resilient a futures market in foreign currencies as
possible in order to facilitate foreign trade and investment.
And fortunately, he was not alone.
While most of the financial world ridiculed the idea, there were
some brave and visionary souls in Chicago who, joined us in this historic step. Without
their intellectual support, without their time and energy, without their conviction, it
may have never come to fruition.
Some of them are with us here today.
(Introduction of dignitaries followed.)
Congratulatory Message from Alan Greenspan
Commemorating the 30th Anniversary of the IMM
U.S. and global financial markets have quite
literally been transformed during the last 30 years and, without question, the
International Money Market has played a noticeably important role in bringing about that
transformation. The list of milestones that it set in place is quite impressive: the first
financial futures contracts (foreign currency futures), the first cash-settled futures
contract (Eurodollar futures), and the first successful equity index (S&P 500
futures), to mention just a few. The launching of the Eurodollar contract, in particular,
proved a landmark. Before the Eurodollar contract, many were unwilling to trade a contract
that could not ultimately be settled through physical delivery of the underlying asset.
And, before the Eurodollar contract, very few banks saw any use for financial futures.
Twenty years after the launch of Eurodollar futures, most financial futures and the vast
majority of swaps are cash settled and banks are the biggest users of Eurodollar futures
and the dominant players in the swaps markets.
To be sure, others have taken advantage of the
innovations that the IMM has made and today the IMM faces fierce competition, not just
from exchanges here in Chicago, but from exchanges and over-the-counter markets around the
world. Nonetheless, the Chicago Mercantile Exchange has become the largest futures
exchange in the United States, largely on the strength of the IMM. Eurodollar futures are
the world's most actively traded futures contracts.
The financial derivatives markets, which the IMM has
played a critical role in developing, have significantly lowered the costs and expanded
the opportunities for hedging risks that previously were not readily deflected. As a
consequence, the financial system is more flexible and efficient than it was 30 years ago,
and economy itself may be more resilient to the real and financial shocks. Indeed, the
transformation of the financial system has been so profound and the benefits so great,
that it seems questionable whether even those that launched the IMM could have fully
appreciated what they were setting in motion. What is clear is that participants in
financial markets across the country and around the globe have good reasons to join the
International Monetary Market in celebrating their 30 years of accomplishment.
* * *
(1) Financial
Innovation: The Last Twenty Years and the Next, Merton H. Miller, Graduate School of
Business, The University of Chicago, Selected Paper Number 63, May 1986.
(2) Comments by Federal Reserve Board Chairman Alan Greenspan on the 30th
Anniversary of the International Monetary Market (IMM), May 12, 2001.
Return to top of page
| Return to Index | Home Page
DISCLAIMER:
This page is for information purposes. The information was obtained from sources believed
to be reliable, but no representation is made as to the accuracy or reliability. Neither
the information, nor any opinion expressed, constitutes a solicitation or the purchase or
sale of any securities, commodities, financial instruments or services. Past performance
is not indicative of future. |