Wake
Up Call
Presented
at the International Association of Financial Engineers
November 9, 1995
New York, New York
Reprinted
in the December 1995 issue of
The Journal of Financial Engineering

We
are at an unprecedented moment in the evolution of finance
and markets. We find ourselves at the vortex of three primary
crosscurrents that have converged to create some turbulent
waters and whose resolve is still uncertain. The rush of
these currents has been extremely rapid and has advanced
upon the world at nearly the same time. Their remarkable
history is quite recent and still very fresh in our memory.
First
came globalization. Walter Wriston, the former chairman
of Citicorp, sensed it early. In 1985 he told us we were
witnessing a “galloping new system of international
finance,” one that was not built by politicians,
economists, central bankers or finance ministers, but by
men and women who interconnected the planet with telecommunications
and computers. As a result, Wriston stated, the world had
replaced the gold standard with the information standard.
Indeed
it had. Our separate financial existence was transformed
into one interrelated, interdependent world economy. Geographical
borders that once could limit the flow of capital are history.
Internal national mechanisms that once could insulate a
population from external price influences are increasingly
impotent. Financial markets have become virtually unencumbered,
continuous, and worldwide. A company located anywhere in
the world can use resources located anywhere in the world,
to produce a product anywhere in the world, to be sold
anywhere in the world.
Second:
political. As Nobel laureate Milton Friedman predicted,
the free economic precepts of Adam Smith combined with
the principles of political freedom espoused by Thomas
Jefferson have resulted in an unmitigated triumph of market-driven
economic order over central planning, of capitalism over
communism, of democracy over dictatorship. The world experienced
the incredible might of these two ideals as together they
seemingly overnight forced the unification of Germany,
the liberalization of Eastern Europe, the fall of communism,
the collapse of the Soviet Union, and the dissolution of
apartheid.
This
political/economic transformation has propelled virtually
every nation in the world to move to a market-driven economic
order. It is a unique historical happenstance. For the
past 20 years when we spoke of a global economy, we were
only talking about 25 percent of mankind—mostly North
America, Western Europe, and Japan. As recently as 1988,
almost 70 percent of mankind was living under Marxist or
socialist economic systems. Suddenly, there are 3 billion
more participants in the capitalist system. Suddenly, every
country on the planet is a competitor in the global marketplace.
Third:
microdynamism. This is a word I made up to explain that
the world has moved from the big to the little. In physics
we traveled from General Relativity to quantum mechanics.
We went from contemplating atoms to inspecting their nuclei
and discovering quarks and leptons. Particle physics was
upon us. Similarly, in biology scientists migrated from
examining individual cells to peering within their structure
and ushering in the era of gene engineering. Molecular
biology was born.
This
microdynamism and downsizing can be seen in every aspect
of our lives. Today’s personal computer, small enough
to be stored in a briefcase, can do much, much more than
the UNIVAC, the world’s first computer, which required
an entire room to be housed. We wear much lighter material
that is warmer and stronger than the bulky clothing of
previous eras. Fiber optic cables are replacing mountains
of copper wire. Transistors transformed the radio and a
myriad of other electrical appliances into handheld devices.
Microprocessors miniaturized the entire technological world
and keep getting smaller and smaller. And on and on.
In
markets, the evolution was strikingly similar. When advancements
in computer technology were applied to established investment
strategies, the result was remarkable. Just as it did in
the sciences, market applications went from macro to micro.
Intricate calculations and state-of-the-art analytical
systems ensued, offering financial engineers the ability
to divide financial risk into its separate components.
Derivatives—the financial equivalents to particle
physics and molecular biology—were born. Investment
methodologies were transformed from all-encompassing traditional
strategies to finely tuned modern portfolio theories. Long-term
hedging evolved into continuous online risk management.
The
foregoing three primary crosscurrents, coupled with a swarm
of secondary flows, have converged to create our present
financial market environment. It is unique to history.
It is still undefined and not understood. It is volatile
and dangerous. At times the whirlpool is smooth and easy
to anticipate. Suddenly it is vicious and unpredictable.
Markets go up with unrelenting force, only to turn without
warning and collapse without end. Participants find inventive
ways to cash in, only to be caught in unsuspecting savage
traps. Rogue traders unearth ingenious techniques to deceive
or cheat as traditional controls are found antiquated or
woefully inadequate. Market regulators, along with business
managers, seem helpless and off guard.
What
shall the world do? Condemn the events that produced the
turbulence? Curse the reality of the present? Outlaw the
markets? Restrict price movement? Ban futures? All of the
above?
We
can neither expunge the history that brought us to this
fate nor prevent its ultimate resolve. We are in the midst
of a great transformation. We are negotiating an unknown
expanse between a world we knew and the one we know not.
We are on a gigantic bridge between past political arrangements,
past economic orders, past technical capabilities, past
market applications, past internal controls, and a new
reality.
We
are yet insufficiently conversant with the new order, its
dimension, its demands, its potential, to write the rules.
If we act in haste to severely harness the currents, rigorously
restrict its flow, or sternly direct its course, we take
the risk of creating conditions far, far more dangerous
than what is naturally in store for us. If we so fear the
computer that we adopt a Luddite philosophy, if we so recoil
from Procter & Gamble, Orange County, Metallgesellschaft,
Barings Bank, Daiwa Bank, or similar debacles yet unknown
that we enact Draconian rules to prevent their occurrence,
if corporate boards shrink from the use of futures because
of fears of consequential losses to their corporate bottom
line, civil actions by shareholders, or sanctions by regulators,
then at best corporate profits are headed south, and at
worst Western civilization has hit its top.
At
this juncture in the transformation, while we dare not
ignore the dangers it has engendered, we must not cower
in its presence. Just as we found it impossible to curtail
the developments in gene engineering, so we will discover
that financial engineering also cannot be stopped. Instead,
we must be prudent and vigilant. We must set standards,
benchmarks, and especially internal controls. We must heed
the lessons we have learned and adopt the prescriptions
that are warranted. We must enforce the recommendations
of such forums as the Group of Thirty, the Windsor Declaration,
and the FIA Global Task Force on Financial Integrity. We
must observe and learn and intensify our education process.
Risk management implicitly must include risk enlightenment.
And,
above all, we must be realistic. There are but two certainties.
Neither is surprising. First, that the metamorphoses I
described are unending—by definition evolution is
a continuing process, whether in physics, biology, or markets.
Second, that the unmistakable common denominator of recent
crosscurrents has been technology. Indeed, throughout the
ages, technology has consistently been the foremost force
in dictating fundamental and revolutionary change in the
political and economic landscape of our planet. In the
past decade, the technology of telecommunications forced
a stark, uncompromising examination of political and economic
systems, bringing down state-controlled economics and racial
inequalities, while the technology of computers enabled
physicists, biologists, and financial engineers to peer
into the smallest detail of our structure and manipulate
its makeup.
Clearly,
the introduction of fire brought about a profound change
in the life of our species, as did the invention of the
wheel, electricity, the printing press, and the industrial
revolution. But events speeded up. The technological revolution
of recent years was of a larger magnitude and came upon
the world in a shorter time span than ever before experienced.
At an unprecedented pace that continues to accelerate,
technology has produced, and continues to produce, fundamental
changes that reverberate through every facet of our civilization,
but nowhere more than in financial markets, where the transformations
have been spectacular, global, and absolute.
There
are still within our markets those who would ignore these
realities. These souls are simply following historian Barbara
Tuchman’s prediction that “Men will not believe
what does not fit in with their plans or suit their prearrangements.” Pity!
For no longer is there a valid debate on the subject. Anyone
who is still skeptical about the direction we are headed
is simply deaf to the thundering maelstrom of the technological
avalanche around us. Anyone who had not seen the handwriting
on the wall is blind to the reality of our times.
One
can no more deny the fact that technology has and will
continue to engulf every aspect of financial markets than
one can restrict the use of derivatives in the management
of risk. The markets of the future will be automated. The
traders of the future will trade by way of the screen.
Those who dare ignore this reality face extinction. Round-the-clock
electronic information in stocks, futures, options, and
mutual funds is now commonplace. Real-time spreadsheet
capabilities which display, analyze, and monitor current
financial data with electronic online data feeds are old
hat. Portfolio information management systems designed
to document and control transactions, provide real-time
positions, P&L, and credit limit updates are routine.
Electronic alerts, predetermined target prices, complex
option spreads, currency conversions, and volatility cones
are now standard trading applications. Software products
providing a host of complex analytical calculations, multidimensional
charts of theoretical pre-expiration curves, historical
comparisons, projections, regressions, and exponential
smoothing from single or multiple databases are abundant.
Risk analysis modules providing a snapshot of the portfolio
under varying market circumstances are standard. Support
programs for exotics such as average rate, chooser, corridor,
digital, double digital, dual, lookback, quanto, and trigger/barrier
options are available. There are even computer trading
systems that anticipate and incorporate the human thought
process of traders, so-called artificial intelligence.
And there are much, much more. For the information standard
has become the information superhighway. There are 37 million
users of the Internet on the North American continent alone.
In
the 1970s and 1980s, futures markets led the way. We recognized
that to survive competitive pressures, we had to embrace
new technologies and integrate them with open outcry. To
compete globally, we recognized that telecommunications
was fashioning a global marketplace that would necessitate
electronic trading mechanisms. Proudly, in 1987 the Chicago
Mercantile Exchange membership overwhelmingly approved
Globex. It was the first embrace of an electronic screen-based
system for futures anywhere in the world. And almost on
cue, the Globex pronouncement resulted in a virtual torrent
of electronic systems devised either to extend existing
trading hours or to conduct the entire transaction process.
The
following year, the Chicago Board of Trade, the Tokyo Stock
Exchange, the Osaka Securities Exchange, the Copenhagen
Stock Exchange, the Danish Options & Futures Exchange,
the Swiss Options &
Financial Futures Exchange (SOFFEX), and the Tokyo Grain Exchange
all launched automated electronic systems. The next year, the
Irish Futures and Options Exchange, the Tokyo International Financial
Futures Exchange (TIFFE), the London International Financial
Futures Exchange (LIFFE), and the Sydney Futures Exchange (SFE)
initiated similar systems. By the end of 1991, ten more exchanges
followed suit, including the Deutsche Terminbörse (DTB),
the London Futures and Options Exchange, the Swedish Options
Market, the Finnish Options Market, and the Mercado Español
de Futuros Financieros (MEFF). Indeed, except for Brazil’s
BM&F and the MATIF in Paris, all new futures exchanges built
since 1986 are fully automated.
Alas,
in recent years, the process toward technology in futures
markets seems to have come to a screeching halt. Suddenly,
our market establishment reverted to establishment ways.
The evidence to support this conclusion is overwhelming.
While Globex volume statistics are growing, they are still
pitifully small and the system itself has become enveloped
in politics. It still accounts for only 1 percent of the
Merc’s annual volume. That is about the same percentage
as the ACCESS system of the NYMEX. The LIFFE APT system
does a little better with about 3 percent of its annual
volume, and the MATIF has done much better. Its Globex
volume has grown from 5.5 percent in 1993 to 8.7 percent
in 1995, proving that technologically the system is sound.
Similarly, Sidney’s SYCOM system has grown from a
5.1 percent of its volume in 1993, to a 1995 total of 8.9
percent. In contrast, the evening session of the CBOT is
losing volume, from 1.6 percent in 1993 to a projected
1.1 percent in 1995.
The
low level of screen-based transaction volume on after-hours
exchange systems gives testimony to a lack of understanding
by many futures exchanges that—like it or not—a
screen-based transaction process is in their members’ future.
While it is comforting to know that the mass of futures
liquidity is still on the floor today, it represents a
false security blanket. Foreign exchange, a market institutionalized
by futures exchanges, offers a stark and sobering comparison
between electronic-driven volume and open outcry. The average
daily FX turnover measured in U.S. dollars was approximately
200 billion in 1986 compared to 1 trillion in 1995, a 500
percent increase. In the last several years, the world
experienced the wildest swings in FX prices ever recorded,
accompanied by huge increases in transaction volume. According
to figures recently released by the Bank for International
Settlements (BIS), the turnover figures for major forex
centers in cash markets between 1992 and 1995 (on a net
basis, with data adjusted for double counting) shows a
whopping increase of 60 percent in London, 46 percent in
New York, 34 percent in Tokyo, 43 percent in Singapore,
30 percent in Switzerland, 49 percent in Hong Kong, and
40 percent in Germany. However, CME foreign exchange contracts
did not benefit from this growth. It registered a mere
9.5 percent increase in volume in 1993 and another 6-plus
percent increase in 1994. While admittedly some of this
OTC volume can be attributed to exotics not traded on the
exchange, one must accept the fact that OTC screen-based
technology is an extremely attractive medium for FX market
transactions.
Indeed,
it is estimated that overall electronic order matching
in foreign exchange has grown from virtually nothing in
1992 to over one-half of FX transactions in 1995. Reuters
Holdings revenue from electronic transaction products in
both equities and FX experienced an increase of 165 percent
from 1990 to 1994. Its Instinet Corporation—whose
affiliates are members of 15 exchanges and trade equities
in 30 countries—did
20 percent of the Nasdaq’s daily volume in 1994.
Its 1995 volume shows transactions of 1 billion shares
per month. Meanwhile, Reuters Dealing 2000–2 averaged
as much as 20,000 FX trades per day in 1995, double its
volume over the last four months. And Reuters is no longer
alone. Electronic Broking Services (EBS), the consortium
made up of some of the world’s largest banks and
FX dealing institutions—ABN-AMRO, Bank of America,
Barclays, Chemical, Citibank, Citicorp, Commerzbank, Credit
Suisse, Lehman Brothers, Midland, J.P. Morgan, NatWest,
Swiss Bankcorp, and Union Bank of Switzerland—has
also come of age. EBS reported that daily volume has risen
from 2,000 a year ago to 10,000 recently. Third in line
is Minex, a two-year-old Asian consortium backed by Dow
Jones/Telerate, Tokyo Forex, and KDD among others, which
already accounts for 20 percent of all FX brokering in
Tokyo and is doing well in Hong Kong and Singapore.
The
global trading day begins in Tokyo and Sydney and is virtually
unbroken 24 hours a day, as it moves around through Singapore
and Hong Kong to Europe and finally the United States before
starting again in Japan. How can the open-outcry hours
of any single exchange hope to capture a significant portion
of such business without a continuous screen-based system?
Not to mention the fact that the fraud perpetrated on Barings
and Daiwa Banks would have been near impossible in any
automated trading system or within an electronic data management
environment.
While
I do not advocate turning off the lights on existing trading
floors—that would be unforgivably stupid—it
is equally suicidal not to seriously prepare for a technological
tomorrow. Whatever progress there has been in recent years
was at a snail’s pace. In almost every critical area
of advanced technological competence, exchanges with trading
floors have fallen behind. For instance, LIFFE is the only
exchange with real-time clearing capabilities. Futures
exchanges are far behind securities exchanges in automatic
order routing. No futures exchanges have advanced capabilities
for floor communications with brokers and have limited
capabilities for handheld price reporting. Only the CBOE
has developed a system for handheld terminals. No futures
exchanges are developing automatic small-order execution
systems. Use of electronic books in the transaction process
can be found only at securities exchanges.
And
everything within the technological revolution of the last
two decades—which produced the present information
standard and transformed the world into what we know today—is
about to become old if not obsolete. For technology is
poised once again to take a quantum leap. The computers
that Walter Wriston wrote about and that wired the world
in the mid-1980s are about to go wireless in the mid-1990s.
Satellites will soon allow wireless communication from
anywhere on the planet. When this wireless transformation
goes into high gear—over the latter half of this
decade—we will literally transfer information over
thin air.
Today’s
cyberwizards have combined the sorcery of electrical and
electromagnetic waves, and propelled them at the incredible
speed of 300 million meters per second, about three-quarters
of the way to the moon with every second. In doing so,
they have produced an invisible wave of energy that can
carry a computer command, the human voice, or virtually
any program including market information, quotations, analysis,
and orders from anywhere to anywhere. The new technology
will create a world in which applications impossible with
wires will result in not just a series of new technological
marvels but a spectacular lifestyle emancipation.
By
unplugging us from existing infrastructures, networks of
information, and communication hookups, we will suddenly
have many more choices about where we live, work, or how
we trade. This new freedom of wireless communications can
be best illustrated with how the simple pager is already
transforming our lives. So-called alphanumeric pagers with
small LCD screens can show not only a phone number but
a complete message. By the end of this year, a so-called
bidirectional pager will enable us not only to receive
e-mail but to acknowledge these messages by choosing one
of the 100 set responses. Think of the possibilities for
trading, if the response is buy or sell and is linked into
an automated trading system.
Millions
of people in African countries are sidestepping their backward
infrastructures with cellular phones. Many millions more
in China are already using pagers to communicate in places
where no wired telephone network exists. Nor will we be
limited to the telephone boundaries of today’s cellular
capabilities. New phone networks, operating by way of satellites,
will begin providing round-the-globe service later in this
decade. Without the limitation of land-based antennas,
everyone on the planet, and especially market traders,
will be able to trade from places never before thought
possible. Are today’s exchanges preparing for this
world?
Futures
markets take heed! Complacency is the enemy. Tomorrow’s
futures traders grew up with Nintendo and Sega. They were
given a keyboard for their fifth birthdays; their homework
was done on a computer; their recreation time was spent
in video centers; the World Wide Web was their playground;
Cyberspeak is their language.
When
the current transformation process has been completed,
when we have crossed the bridge to the new reality, when
the new set of rules has been written, futures will still
be a primary way to manage financial risk, but it will
be carried out on the information superhighway. Tomorrow’s
traders will likely execute a complex set of trades from
an interactive multidimensional wireless communication
system representing the coalescence of key communications
technologies: television, telephone, personal computer,
and laser storage systems. The only question remaining
is whether those trades will still be transacted on our
futures exchanges.
Return
to top of page | Return to
Index | Home Page
|