|

Who Were We?

Success of the International Monetary
Market (IMM) of the CME defied all the odds.
"It’s ludicrous to think
that foreign exchange can be entrusted to a bunch of pork belly
crapshooters," proclaimed a prominent New York banker on
the eve of the launch of the IMM.
"The New Currency Market
is strictly for crapshooters," echoed Business Week.
"If you fancy yourself an international money speculator
but lack the resources...your day has come."
And in 1976, at the opening of the
IMM’s interest rate market, the respected Economist mocked
our efforts with the following nasty missile:
Like Linda Lovelace, the
girl with the deep throat, the International Monetary Market (IMM)
of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange tries to make money by being
more outrages than its rivals. Now that its currency futures market
is well established–it was opened in 1972 by women in fancy dress–the
IMM has this month opened a trading pit in the United States treasury
bill futures. Bidding for the government paper takes place on the
same floor as for pork bellies, live cattle, and three-month eggs.
A decade later, at the opening of
our stock index futures market, Barron’s seemingly joined
the nay-sayers with the following derisive comment: "Like
their lightning-paced video game counterparts, stock index futures
offer instant gratification or instant annihilation depending on
the accuracy of your impulses and quickness of your reflexes."
Of course, the media and other
detractors missed the point entirely. The IMM was not out to beat
anybody, nor were we trying to resurrect or reinvent something.
This was a brand new invention–financial futures. In 1972,
it represented a bold experiment to create new markets to respond
to an era in transition, eventually known as globalization.
We were attempting to draw a road map for the financial geography
that lay ahead, trying to provide business and finance the same
risk transfer mechanisms that their agricultural counterparts had
been successfully using for more than 100 years. A mechanism they
would soon dearly need.
Revenge is sweet! In 1986, Professor
Merton Miller, the 1990 Nobel Laureate in Economics, ranked the
invention of financial futures as "the most significant financial
innovation of the last twenty years." And in March of 1999,
Alan Greenspan had this to say about the development and expansion
of financial derivatives in general:
By far the most significant event
in finance during the past decade has been the extraordinary development
and expansion of financial derivatives....These instruments enhance
the ability to differentiate risk and allocate it to those investors
most able and willing to take it.....a process that has undoubtedly
improved national productively growth and standards of living.
So how did the IMM defy the odds? How
did the IMM succeed in introducing the concept of financial futures
which today has been embraced and copied in every financial center
the world over? In 1982, at
the gala celebration of the IMM’s tenth anniversary–at which the 1976
Nobel Laureate in Economics, Milton Friedman was Guest of Honor–Leo
Melamed attempted to answer this question. The IMM’s success, he suggested,
can be better be explained by who we were rather than by "how
we did it:"

Who Were We?
We were a bunch of guys
who were hungry
We were traders to whom
it not matter
Whether it was eggs or gold, bellies or
The British Pound, turkeys or T-bills.
We were babes in the woods,
innocents,
In a world we did not understand,
Too dumb to be scared.
We were audacious, brazen,
raucous pioneers,
Too unworldly to know we could not win.
That the odds against us
were too high;
That the banks would never trust us;
That the government would never let us;
That Chicago was the wrong place.

The traders became our army.
They were our secret weapon.
Most of the world underestimated the power they represented.
Return to top of page | Return
to Index | Home Page
DISCLAIMER:
This page is for information purposes. The information was obtained
from sources believed to be reliable, but no representation is made
as to the accuracy or reliability. Neither the information, nor
any opinion expressed, constitutes a solicitation or the purchase
or sale of any securities, commodities, financial instruments or
services. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
|